On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:52:28AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env->sd and
> not just the first group of
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:20:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:05:51PM +0900, ���ؼ� wrote:
>
> What is with you people; have you never learned to trim emails?
>
> Seriously, I'm going to write a script which tests to too many quoted
> lines, too many nested quotes
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:20:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:05:51PM +0900, ���ؼ� wrote:
What is with you people; have you never learned to trim emails?
Seriously, I'm going to write a script which tests to too many quoted
lines, too many nested quotes and
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:52:28AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 08/02/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env-sd and
not just the first group of env-sd like you
On 08/02/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env->sd and
not just the first group of env->sd like you are doing above. This is to
>>>
>>> I don't think so.
>>>
On 08/02/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env-sd and
not just the first group of env-sd like you are doing above. This is to
I don't think so.
IIRC, env-sd-groups
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> >> You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env->sd and
> >> not just the first group of env->sd like you are doing above. This is to
> >
> > I don't think so.
> > IIRC, env->sd->groups always means local group,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:05:51PM +0900, ���ؼ� wrote:
What is with you people; have you never learned to trim emails?
Seriously, I'm going to write a script which tests to too many quoted
lines, too many nested quotes and other such nonsense and drop your
emails into /dev/null.
*shees*
--
To
>> Galbraith; Paul Turner; Alex Shi; Vincent Guittot; Morten Rasmussen;
>> Namhyung Kim; Joonsoo Kim
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
>>
>> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> Hello, Preeti.
>
>>
>> On 08/02/2013 0
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:51:45AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 2 August 2013 03:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
> > is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
> > relationship to this function. There is
; Morten Rasmussen;
> Namhyung Kim; Joonsoo Kim
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
>
> Hi Joonsoo,
Hello, Preeti.
>
> On 08/02/2013 07:20 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or n
On 2 August 2013 03:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
> is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
> relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
> this checking at update_sg_lb_stats(), except
On 2 August 2013 03:50, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
this checking at
; Joonsoo Kim
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
Hi Joonsoo,
Hello, Preeti.
On 08/02/2013 07:20 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not is
embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:51:45AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 2 August 2013 03:50, Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com wrote:
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this
Guittot; Morten Rasmussen;
Namhyung Kim; Joonsoo Kim
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
Hi Joonsoo,
Hello, Preeti.
On 08/02/2013 07:20 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not is
embedded
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:05:51PM +0900, ���ؼ� wrote:
What is with you people; have you never learned to trim emails?
Seriously, I'm going to write a script which tests to too many quoted
lines, too many nested quotes and other such nonsense and drop your
emails into /dev/null.
*shees*
--
To
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:56:14PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
You need to iterate over all the groups of the sched domain env-sd and
not just the first group of env-sd like you are doing above. This is to
I don't think so.
IIRC, env-sd-groups always means local group,
so we don't
Hi Joonsoo,
On 08/02/2013 07:20 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
> is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
> relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
> this checking at
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
this checking at update_sg_lb_stats(), except saving one iteration
for sched_group_cpus.
In this
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
this checking at update_sg_lb_stats(), except saving one iteration
for sched_group_cpus.
In this
Hi Joonsoo,
On 08/02/2013 07:20 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
this checking at update_sg_lb_stats(),
22 matches
Mail list logo
