Andre, Rob,
On 16:38-20210126, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Now that I look back at the dtc change, I'm now confused why this
> > check got applied. Both David and I wanted changes in regards to
> > #address-cells. Either a separate check or part of interrupt-map checks.
> > And the interrupt-map
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:01:08 -0600
Rob Herring wrote:
Hi,
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 01:17:36PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18/11/2020 17:12, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > On 13:38-20201118, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > > > Hi Rob,
> > > >
> > > > On 17/11/2020 18:19,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 01:17:36PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 18/11/2020 17:12, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 13:38-20201118, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > > > With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2
Hi Rob, Grygorii,
On 27/11/20 7:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT
>> maintainers.
>>
On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT
> maintainers.
> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I
On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote:
The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT
maintainers.
90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never
seen in in GPIO nodes
(most
On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> >> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT
> >> maintainers.
> >> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never
> >> seen in in GPIO nodes
> >> (most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes).
> >>
On 19/11/20 6:58 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Punting over to Rob and DT team's wisdom..
>
> On 13:17-20201119, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18/11/2020 17:12, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 13:38-20201118, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori
Punting over to Rob and DT team's wisdom..
On 13:17-20201119, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 18/11/2020 17:12, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 13:38-20201118, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > > > With dtc 1.6.0, building TI
On 18/11/2020 17:12, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 13:38-20201118, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori wrote:
With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings
like below for all interrupt controllers.
On 13:38-20201118, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings
> > like below for all interrupt controllers.
> >
> > /bus@10/bus@3000/interrupt-controller1: Missing
Hi Rob,
On 17/11/2020 18:19, Sekhar Nori wrote:
With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings
like below for all interrupt controllers.
/bus@10/bus@3000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells in
interrupt provider
Fix these by adding #address-cells
With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings
like below for all interrupt controllers.
/bus@10/bus@3000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells in
interrupt provider
Fix these by adding #address-cells = <0>; for all interrupt controllers in
TI
13 matches
Mail list logo
