On 2/2/21 11:42 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:33 AM Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I found that you may forget to remove set_page_huge_active()
> from include/linux/hugetlb.h.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:33 AM Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
> what code checking the
On 1/21/21 10:53 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Hi:
> On 2021/1/20 9:30, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
>> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
>> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not
Hi:
On 2021/1/20 9:30, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
> what code checking the flag wanted to
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 01:48:05PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> This comment addresses both this patch and the next one.
> >>
> >> Instead of putting the SetHPageMigratable flag spread over the
> >> allocation paths, would it make more sense to place it in
> >> alloc_huge_page before returning
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:33 AM Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
> what code checking the
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:30:46PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
> what code checking
On 1/20/21 2:00 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:59:05AM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:30:46PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
>>> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:59:05AM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:30:46PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
> > page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
> > that a huge page
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:30:46PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
> page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
> that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
> what code checking
Use the new hugetlb page specific flag HPageMigratable to replace the
page_huge_active interfaces. By it's name, page_huge_active implied
that a huge page was on the active list. However, that is not really
what code checking the flag wanted to know. It really wanted to determine
if the huge
11 matches
Mail list logo
