Hello Grygorii,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:31:22PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 05:57 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >I don't understand your use of "query" in the subject and later in the
> >commit log. Do you mean "send"?
>
> will change to "generate". Ok?
yes that would be be
On 11/26/2014 05:57 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
I don't understand your use of "query" in the subject and later in the
commit log. Do you mean "send"?
will change to "generate". Ok?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:50PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
According to I2C specification the
Hello,
I don't understand your use of "query" in the subject and later in the
commit log. Do you mean "send"?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:50PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> According to I2C specification the NACK should be handled as folows:
s/folows/follows/
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutro
According to I2C specification the NACK should be handled as folows:
"When SDA remains HIGH during this ninth clock pulse, this is defined as the Not
Acknowledge signal. The master can then generate either a STOP condition to
abort the transfer, or a repeated START condition to start a new transfer
4 matches
Mail list logo
