Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, James Bottomley wrote: > That's not the correct location: DMARC records should be at the _dmarc. > subdomain. without this you'll inherit the dmarc policy of > _dmarc.microsoft.com > Thanks. > > We don't have DKIM set up yet. > > If you advertise DMARC, you're expected

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 08:34 +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:19 AM prsriva > om> wrote: > > > > > > I will fix the comments and send out the patchset with a cover > > > letter. Thankyou for pointing this out. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:34 PM James Morris wrote: > > > > Please fix. > > It's the correct SMTP server for linux.microsoft.com. In that case, it seems that your SMTP server is misconfigured, and shouldn't be used. > linux.microsoft.com.3600IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:13.77.154.182 >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:19 AM prsriva wrote: > > > > I will fix the comments and send out the patchset with a cover letter. > > Thankyou for pointing this out. > > Please trim the emails you reply to rather than quoting everything. > > But the

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread Nayna
On 04/25/2019 01:19 PM, prsriva wrote: On 2019-04-25 4:48 a.m., Nayna wrote: On 04/23/2019 08:15 PM, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: From: Prakhar Srivastava Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava --- The v2 version has to be on top of the HEAD of the repository itself, and not on the v1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:19 AM prsriva wrote: > > I will fix the comments and send out the patchset with a cover letter. > Thankyou for pointing this out. Please trim the emails you reply to rather than quoting everything. But the real reason I'm reacting to this email is because it was

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread prsriva
On 2019-04-25 4:48 a.m., Nayna wrote: On 04/23/2019 08:15 PM, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: From: Prakhar Srivastava Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava --- Currently for soft reboot(kexec_file_load) the kernel file and signature is measured by IMA. The cmdline args used to load the kernel is

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-25 Thread Nayna
On 04/23/2019 08:15 PM, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: From: Prakhar Srivastava Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava --- Currently for soft reboot(kexec_file_load) the kernel file and signature is measured by IMA. The cmdline args used to load the kernel is not measured. The boot aggregate that

[PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic

2019-04-23 Thread Prakhar Srivastava
From: Prakhar Srivastava Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava --- Currently for soft reboot(kexec_file_load) the kernel file and signature is measured by IMA. The cmdline args used to load the kernel is not measured. The boot aggregate that gets calculated will have no change since the EFI loader