Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms

2013-12-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > > > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods > > > > I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my > > m

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms

2013-12-04 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods > > I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my > mail from you so I'm not sure and I'd like

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms

2013-12-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my mail from you so I'm not sure and I'd like to know whether all feedback was addressed. Thanks, Ingo -- To u

[PATCH v2 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms

2013-12-03 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2. Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM. The e820 map in said machine looks like this: [0.00] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000