* Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >
> > > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
> >
> > I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my
> > m
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:08:14AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
> > v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
>
> I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my
> mail from you so I'm not sure and I'd like
* ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
I guess v2 is a reaction to my review feedback? I got no reply to my
mail from you so I'm not sure and I'd like to know whether all
feedback was addressed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To u
From: Ville Syrjälä
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
[0.00] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000
4 matches
Mail list logo