On 02/04/2014 02:08 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:54:37 +0400 Vladimir Davydov
> wrote:
>
>> The way memcg_create_kmem_cache() creates the name for a memcg cache
>> looks rather strange: it first formats the name in the static buffer
>> tmp_name protected by a mutex, then passe
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:54:37 +0400 Vladimir Davydov
wrote:
> The way memcg_create_kmem_cache() creates the name for a memcg cache
> looks rather strange: it first formats the name in the static buffer
> tmp_name protected by a mutex, then passes the pointer to the buffer to
> kmem_cache_create_me
The way memcg_create_kmem_cache() creates the name for a memcg cache
looks rather strange: it first formats the name in the static buffer
tmp_name protected by a mutex, then passes the pointer to the buffer to
kmem_cache_create_memcg(), which finally duplicates it to the cache
name.
Let's clean th
3 matches
Mail list logo
