On 08/27/2014 03:56 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/27/2014 12:13 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren
wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/27/2014 12:13 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren
On 27 August 2014 23:08, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren
> wrote:
>> I'm not even sure if it's appropriate for the low-level mailbox driver to
>> know about the semantics of the message, rather than simply sending them on
>> to the client driver?
On 08/27/2014 12:13 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren
wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
+static int
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct platform_device
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>
>> The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
>> processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a single
>> communication channel, messages sent
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a single
communication channel,
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
+static int
On 08/27/2014 12:13 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew
On 27 August 2014 23:08, Andrew Bresticker abres...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
I'm not even sure if it's appropriate for the low-level mailbox driver to
know about the semantics of the message, rather than simply sending
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/27/2014 12:13 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM,
On 08/27/2014 03:56 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 08/27/2014 12:13 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:38 AM, Andrew
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:20:13 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >
> > > I'm not sure if it's really worth it. One thing we might do is just
> > > remove all definitions of
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:20:13 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >
> > I'm not sure if it's really worth it. One thing we might do is just
> > remove all definitions of ioremap_nocache and add a wrapper to
> > include/linux/io.h, to make it
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:08:11 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:54:53 David Laight wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
> ...
> > > Is _nocache required? I don't see other drivers using it. I assume there's
> > > nothing special about the mbox registers.
> >
> > Most drivers should be using devm_ioremap_resource() which will use the
> >
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:08:11 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM
From: Thierry Reding
...
> > Is _nocache required? I don't see other drivers using it. I assume there's
> > nothing special about the mbox registers.
>
> Most drivers should be using devm_ioremap_resource() which will use the
> _nocache variant of devm_ioremap() when appropriate. Usually the
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > > On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >+static int
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> [...]
> > >+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > >+res =
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
[...]
> >+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> >+res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >+if (!res)
> >+return
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
[...]
+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+if (!res)
+return -ENODEV;
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
[...]
+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+res = platform_get_resource(pdev,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
[...]
+static int tegra_xusb_mbox_probe(struct
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker
From: Thierry Reding
...
Is _nocache required? I don't see other drivers using it. I assume there's
nothing special about the mbox registers.
Most drivers should be using devm_ioremap_resource() which will use the
_nocache variant of devm_ioremap() when appropriate. Usually the region
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:01:52PM -0600,
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:08:11 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:31 Thierry
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:54:53 David Laight wrote:
From: Thierry Reding
...
Is _nocache required? I don't see other drivers using it. I assume there's
nothing special about the mbox registers.
Most drivers should be using devm_ioremap_resource() which will use the
_nocache
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 11:08:11 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:50:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Arnd
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:20:13 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I'm not sure if it's really worth it. One thing we might do is just
remove all definitions of ioremap_nocache and add a wrapper to
include/linux/io.h, to make it more
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:35:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:20:13 Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I'm not sure if it's really worth it. One thing we might do is just
remove all definitions of
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a single
communication channel, messages sent by the controller can be divided
into two groups: those intended for
On 08/18/2014 11:08 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a single
communication channel, messages sent by the controller can be divided
into two groups: those intended for
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a single
communication channel, messages sent by the controller can be divided
into two groups: those intended for the PHY driver and those intended
for the
The Tegra xHCI controller's firmware communicates requests to the host
processor through a mailbox interface. While there is only a single
communication channel, messages sent by the controller can be divided
into two groups: those intended for the PHY driver and those intended
for the
40 matches
Mail list logo
