On Wed 2020-06-17 07:23:34, jim.cro...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 3:52 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 2020-06-17 10:31:54, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:05:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 3:52 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> On Wed 2020-06-17 10:31:54, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:05:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:34, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed 2020-06-17 10:31:54, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:05:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:34, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > > > There are *lots* of ad-hoc debug printing solutions in kernel,
> >
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:05:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:34, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > > There are *lots* of ad-hoc debug printing solutions in kernel,
> > > this is a 1st attempt at providing a common mechanism
> Or that meaning could be handled by merely issuing the fill-in activations.
> In the module that wants debug levels
>
> echo module foo mflags 4 >control
> auto generates same query 3 more times, with mflags 3 flags 2 mflags:1
>
let me also note that just because a module might do the
hi Petr,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:45 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:34, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > There are *lots* of ad-hoc debug printing solutions in kernel,
> > this is a 1st attempt at providing a common mechanism for many of them.
>
> I agree that it might make sense to
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:34, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > There are *lots* of ad-hoc debug printing solutions in kernel,
> > this is a 1st attempt at providing a common mechanism for many of them.
>
> I agree that it might make sense to provide some
On Sat 2020-06-13 09:57:34, Jim Cromie wrote:
> There are *lots* of ad-hoc debug printing solutions in kernel,
> this is a 1st attempt at providing a common mechanism for many of them.
I agree that it might make sense to provide some common mechanism.
> Basically, there are 2 styles of debug
On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 09:57 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> 3- pr_class:5 gives 32 print-classes
>we can map [1-9a-w] to select any pr_class with 1 char
>then "12", "af" work as noted.
>it is succinct, but arcane.
arcane generally isn't useful.
>but it does allow mnemonic choices of
There are *lots* of ad-hoc debug printing solutions in kernel,
this is a 1st attempt at providing a common mechanism for many of them.
Basically, there are 2 styles of debug printing:
- levels, with increasing verbosity, 1-10 forex
- bits/flags, independently controlling separate groups of
10 matches
Mail list logo