On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 12:43 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > To be sure it faster we need the measurements. Sometimes it's not
> > obvious.
[]
> Speaking pedantically, you're right. But as a practical matter, it's
> very unlikely, and what makes it truly insignificant is t
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Something wrong with mail configuration?
Oops, sorry, I forgot to delete the header.
> On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 15:25 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
>> It's also faster, as hex_to_bin() *is* inlined within hex2bin()
>> (if you compile with -O).
> To be sure it faster we
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 15:25 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> From andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com Sun Jun 05 14:19:48 2016
> X-ExtLoop1: 1
> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,421,1459839600";
> d="scan'208";a="995605979"
> Subject: Re: [PAT
>From andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com Sun Jun 05 14:19:48 2016
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,421,1459839600";
d="scan'208";a="995605979"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/2] lib/uuid.c: Silence an unchecked return value
warning
From: Andy
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 09:16 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko pointed out that __uuid_to_bin doesn't need to check
> the return value from hex2bin(), because the preceding uuid_is_valid()
> check already took care of that.
>
> But hex2bin() is declared __must_check, so checking anyway
Andy Shevchenko pointed out that __uuid_to_bin doesn't need to check
the return value from hex2bin(), because the preceding uuid_is_valid()
check already took care of that.
But hex2bin() is declared __must_check, so checking anyway is the
simplest way to silence the warning.
This cancels a small
6 matches
Mail list logo