2014-06-02 19:47 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, June 02, 2014 09:37:49 AM Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Hi Joonsoo,
>>
>> CC'ing the developer of the patch (Tomasz Stanislawski)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> > 2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00
Hi,
On Monday, June 02, 2014 09:37:49 AM Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> CC'ing the developer of the patch (Tomasz Stanislawski)
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > 2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00 Ritesh Harjani :
> >> Hi Joonsoo,
> >>
> >> I think you will be
Hi,
On Monday, June 02, 2014 09:37:49 AM Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Hi Joonsoo,
CC'ing the developer of the patch (Tomasz Stanislawski)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Joonsoo Kim js1...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00 Ritesh Harjani ritesh.l...@gmail.com:
Hi Joonsoo,
I
2014-06-02 19:47 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com:
Hi,
On Monday, June 02, 2014 09:37:49 AM Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Hi Joonsoo,
CC'ing the developer of the patch (Tomasz Stanislawski)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Joonsoo Kim js1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joonsoo,
CC'ing the developer of the patch (Tomasz Stanislawski)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00 Ritesh Harjani :
>> Hi Joonsoo,
>>
>> I think you will be loosing the benefit of below patch with your changes.
>> I am no expert here so please
Hi Joonsoo,
CC'ing the developer of the patch (Tomasz Stanislawski)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Joonsoo Kim js1...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00 Ritesh Harjani ritesh.l...@gmail.com:
Hi Joonsoo,
I think you will be loosing the benefit of below patch with your changes.
I
2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00 Ritesh Harjani :
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> I think you will be loosing the benefit of below patch with your changes.
> I am no expert here so please bear with me. I tried explaining in the
> inline comments, let me know if I am wrong.
>
> commit
Hi Joonsoo,
I think you will be loosing the benefit of below patch with your changes.
I am no expert here so please bear with me. I tried explaining in the
inline comments, let me know if I am wrong.
commit 026b08147923142e925a7d0aaa39038055ae0156
Author: Tomasz Stanislawski
Date: Wed Jun 12
Hi Joonsoo,
I think you will be loosing the benefit of below patch with your changes.
I am no expert here so please bear with me. I tried explaining in the
inline comments, let me know if I am wrong.
commit 026b08147923142e925a7d0aaa39038055ae0156
Author: Tomasz Stanislawski
2014-05-30 19:40 GMT+09:00 Ritesh Harjani ritesh.l...@gmail.com:
Hi Joonsoo,
I think you will be loosing the benefit of below patch with your changes.
I am no expert here so please bear with me. I tried explaining in the
inline comments, let me know if I am wrong.
commit
commit d95ea5d1('cma: fix watermark checking') introduces ALLOC_CMA flag
for alloc flag and treats free cma pages as free pages if this flag is
passed to watermark checking. Intention of that patch is that movable page
allocation can be be handled from cma reserved region without starting
kswapd.
commit d95ea5d1('cma: fix watermark checking') introduces ALLOC_CMA flag
for alloc flag and treats free cma pages as free pages if this flag is
passed to watermark checking. Intention of that patch is that movable page
allocation can be be handled from cma reserved region without starting
kswapd.
12 matches
Mail list logo