On 23/08/2018 09:15, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.08.2018 08:44, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 22/08/2018 19:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
Currently the CRYCB format used in the host for the
shadowed CRYCB is FORMAT2 while no check is done if
AP instructions
On 23.08.2018 08:44, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 22/08/2018 19:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> Currently the CRYCB format used in the host for the
>>> shadowed CRYCB is FORMAT2 while no check is done if
>>> AP instructions are supported in the host.
>>>
>>>
On 22/08/2018 19:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
Currently the CRYCB format used in the host for the
shadowed CRYCB is FORMAT2 while no check is done if
AP instructions are supported in the host.
We better use the format the host calculated for the
guest 1
On 22/08/2018 19:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
Currently the CRYCB format used in the host for the
shadowed CRYCB is FORMAT2 while no check is done if
AP instructions are supported in the host.
We better use the format the host calculated for the
guest 1
On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Currently the CRYCB format used in the host for the
> shadowed CRYCB is FORMAT2 while no check is done if
> AP instructions are supported in the host.
>
> We better use the format the host calculated for the
> guest 1 as the host already tested it against
Currently the CRYCB format used in the host for the
shadowed CRYCB is FORMAT2 while no check is done if
AP instructions are supported in the host.
We better use the format the host calculated for the
guest 1 as the host already tested it against its
facility set.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel
---
6 matches
Mail list logo