On 8/27/20 11:38 PM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 27/08/20 21:34, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 8/27/20 12:26 PM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> thanks for the prompt feedback!
>>>
>>> On 27/08/20 20:59, Tom Rix wrote:
On 8/27/20 7:32 AM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> In preparation t
Hi Tom,
On 27/08/20 21:34, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 8/27/20 12:26 PM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> thanks for the prompt feedback!
>>
>> On 27/08/20 20:59, Tom Rix wrote:
>>> On 8/27/20 7:32 AM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
In preparation to add error checking for gpiod_get_value(), rework
>>>
Hi Tom,
thanks for the prompt feedback!
On 27/08/20 20:59, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 8/27/20 7:32 AM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> In preparation to add error checking for gpiod_get_value(), rework
>> the loop to avoid the duplication of these lines:
>>
>> if (gpiod_get_value(conf->done))
>>
On 8/27/20 7:32 AM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> In preparation to add error checking for gpiod_get_value(), rework
> the loop to avoid the duplication of these lines:
>
> if (gpiod_get_value(conf->done))
> return xilinx_spi_apply_cclk_cycles(conf);
>
> There is little advantage in
In preparation to add error checking for gpiod_get_value(), rework
the loop to avoid the duplication of these lines:
if (gpiod_get_value(conf->done))
return xilinx_spi_apply_cclk_cycles(conf);
There is little advantage in this rework with current code. However
error checki
5 matches
Mail list logo