On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:01:23PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/15/2014 12:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> >> I have also suggested this device (2 actually) would be better supported
> >> as an
> >> IIO accelerometer device, but even that would change the sysfs interface by
> >>
On 09/15/2014 12:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
>> I have also suggested this device (2 actually) would be better supported as
>> an
>> IIO accelerometer device, but even that would change the sysfs interface by
>> removing these altogether and using the IIO standardized path and
>>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:29:27PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:50:37PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> > The position file on sysfs was reporting absolute values
> > for its axes.
> >
> > This patch fixes the direction reporting (either negative
> > or positive), as well
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:50:37PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
> The position file on sysfs was reporting absolute values
> for its axes.
>
> This patch fixes the direction reporting (either negative
> or positive), as well as added a mutex lock to it.
>
Hi All,
I've added Greg KH, Rafael, and
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:50:37PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
The position file on sysfs was reporting absolute values
for its axes.
This patch fixes the direction reporting (either negative
or positive), as well as added a mutex lock to it.
Hi All,
I've added Greg KH, Rafael, and H.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:29:27PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 06:50:37PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
The position file on sysfs was reporting absolute values
for its axes.
This patch fixes the direction reporting (either negative
or positive), as well as added a
On 09/15/2014 12:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I have also suggested this device (2 actually) would be better supported as
an
IIO accelerometer device, but even that would change the sysfs interface by
removing these altogether and using the IIO standardized path and
accelerometer
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:01:23PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 09/15/2014 12:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I have also suggested this device (2 actually) would be better supported
as an
IIO accelerometer device, but even that would change the sysfs interface by
removing these
The position file on sysfs was reporting absolute values
for its axes.
This patch fixes the direction reporting (either negative
or positive), as well as added a mutex lock to it.
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos
---
This was: Add accelerometer input polled device
Changes since v1:
Dropped polldev
The position file on sysfs was reporting absolute values
for its axes.
This patch fixes the direction reporting (either negative
or positive), as well as added a mutex lock to it.
Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos coproscef...@gmail.com
---
This was: Add accelerometer input polled device
Changes
10 matches
Mail list logo
