> I am the maintainer. So yes I keep it as such ... with this complexity ;)
BTW you are not listed as such. Can you send an incremental patch for
MAINTAINERS?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> I am the maintainer. So yes I keep it as such ... with this complexity ;)
BTW you are not listed as such. Can you send an incremental patch for
MAINTAINERS?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 04/03/2018 05:31 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
>>>
>>> What does that mean?
>>
>> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but
>> I'm
>> struggling to put them back to operational state
On 04/03/2018 05:31 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
>>>
>>> What does that mean?
>>
>> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but
>> I'm
>> struggling to put them back to operational state
On 04/03/2018 05:31 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
>>>
>>> What does that mean?
>>
>> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but
>> I'm
>> struggling to put them back to operational state
On 04/03/2018 05:31 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
>>>
>>> What does that mean?
>>
>> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but
>> I'm
>> struggling to put them back to operational state
> >> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
> >
> > What does that mean?
>
> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but
> I'm
> struggling to put them back to operational state after recent changes related
> to
> SMBust Host
> >> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
> >
> > What does that mean?
>
> It miss SMBus Host Notification and SMBBus Alert. They are almost ready but
> I'm
> struggling to put them back to operational state after recent changes related
> to
> SMBust Host
On 03/24/2018 11:49 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
>> This patch adds SMBus support for I2C controller embedded in STM32F7 Soc.
>
>> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
>
> What does that mean?
It
On 03/24/2018 11:49 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
>> This patch adds SMBus support for I2C controller embedded in STM32F7 Soc.
>
>> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
>
> What does that mean?
It
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> This patch adds SMBus support for I2C controller embedded in STM32F7 Soc.
> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
What does that mean?
>
> Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Pierre-Yves MORDRET wrote:
> This patch adds SMBus support for I2C controller embedded in STM32F7 Soc.
> All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
What does that mean?
>
> Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga
>
This patch adds SMBus support for I2C controller embedded in STM32F7 Soc.
All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
---
Version history:
This patch adds SMBus support for I2C controller embedded in STM32F7 Soc.
All SMBus protocols are implemented except SMBus-specific protocols.
Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET
---
Version history:
v1:
* Initial
v2:
* fix Kbuild
14 matches
Mail list logo