On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>
>> Use call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec() instead of
>> calling call_usermodehelper_fns(). In case the latter returns -ENOMEM
>> the cleanup function may had not been called - in this
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> Use call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec() instead of
> calling call_usermodehelper_fns(). In case the latter returns -ENOMEM
> the cleanup function may had not been called - in this case we would
> not free argv and module_name.
>
>
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Use call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec() instead of
calling call_usermodehelper_fns(). In case the latter returns -ENOMEM
the cleanup function may had not been called - in this case we would
not free argv and module_name.
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Use call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec() instead of
calling call_usermodehelper_fns(). In case the latter returns -ENOMEM
the cleanup function may had not been called - in
Use call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec() instead of
calling call_usermodehelper_fns(). In case the latter returns -ENOMEM
the cleanup function may had not been called - in this case we would
not free argv and module_name.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi
---
kernel/kmod.c | 15
Use call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec() instead of
calling call_usermodehelper_fns(). In case the latter returns -ENOMEM
the cleanup function may had not been called - in this case we would
not free argv and module_name.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi
6 matches
Mail list logo
