On 06.09.19 14:38, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:02:22AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 05.09.19 12:15, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> handle_userfaultfd() is currently the only one place in the kernel
>>> page fault procedures that can respond to non-fatal userspace signals.
>>> It was
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:02:22AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.09.19 12:15, Peter Xu wrote:
> > handle_userfaultfd() is currently the only one place in the kernel
> > page fault procedures that can respond to non-fatal userspace signals.
> > It was trying to detect such an allowance by
On 05.09.19 12:15, Peter Xu wrote:
> handle_userfaultfd() is currently the only one place in the kernel
> page fault procedures that can respond to non-fatal userspace signals.
> It was trying to detect such an allowance by checking against USER &
> KILLABLE flags, which was "un-official".
>
> In
handle_userfaultfd() is currently the only one place in the kernel
page fault procedures that can respond to non-fatal userspace signals.
It was trying to detect such an allowance by checking against USER &
KILLABLE flags, which was "un-official".
In this patch, we introduced a new flag (FAULT_FLA
4 matches
Mail list logo