On 11/25/2015 01:04 PM, Gang He wrote:
> Hi Mark and Junxiao,
>
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 11/25/2015 06:16 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
>>> Hi Junxiao,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:12:35PM +0800, Junxiao Bi wrote:
Hi Gang,
This is not like a right patch.
First, online file c
Hi Mark and Junxiao,
>>>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 11/25/2015 06:16 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
>> Hi Junxiao,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:12:35PM +0800, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>>> Hi Gang,
>>>
>>> This is not like a right patch.
>>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
>>
Hi Mark,
On 11/25/2015 06:16 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Hi Junxiao,
>
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:12:35PM +0800, Junxiao Bi wrote:
>> Hi Gang,
>>
>> This is not like a right patch.
>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
>> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I nev
Hi Junxiao,
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:12:35PM +0800, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> This is not like a right patch.
> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
> happened only on this field, if thes
>>>
> On 11/03/2015 04:47 PM, Gang He wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
>>> On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
Hello Junxiao,
See my comments inline.
>>>
> Hi Gang,
>
> This is not like a right patch.
> First, online file check only checks inode's block n
On 11/03/2015 04:47 PM, Gang He wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
>>> Hello Junxiao,
>>>
>>> See my comments inline.
>>>
>>>
>>
Hi Gang,
This is not like a right patch.
First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
f
>>>
> On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
>> Hello Junxiao,
>>
>> See my comments inline.
>>
>>
>
>>> Hi Gang,
>>>
>>> This is not like a right patch.
>>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
>>> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real c
On 11/03/2015 04:15 PM, Gang He wrote:
> Hello Junxiao,
>
> See my comments inline.
>
>
>> Hi Gang,
>>
>> This is not like a right patch.
>> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
>> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
>> happened
Hello Junxiao,
See my comments inline.
>>>
> Hi Gang,
>
> This is not like a right patch.
> First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
> fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
> happened only on this field, if these fields are corrupted, th
Hi Gang,
This is not like a right patch.
First, online file check only checks inode's block number, valid flag,
fs generation value, and meta ecc. I never see a real corruption
happened only on this field, if these fields are corrupted, that means
something bad may happen on other place. So fix th
Implement online check or fix inode block during
reading a inode block to memory.
Signed-off-by: Gang He
---
fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 196 +++--
fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_trace.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/i
11 matches
Mail list logo
