On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:30:30PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> flush_thread() -> drop_init_fpu() is suboptimal and confusing. It does
> drop_fpu() or restore_init_xstate() depending on !use_eager_fpu(). But
> flush_thread() too checks eagerfpu right after that, and if it is true
> then restore_in
flush_thread() -> drop_init_fpu() is suboptimal and confusing. It does
drop_fpu() or restore_init_xstate() depending on !use_eager_fpu(). But
flush_thread() too checks eagerfpu right after that, and if it is true
then restore_init_xstate() just burns CPU for no reason. We are going to
load init_xst
2 matches
Mail list logo