Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] xen-blkif: drop struct blkif_request_segment_aligned

2014-02-12 Thread Egger, Christoph
On 07.02.14 04:38, Matthew Rushton wrote: >> This was wrongly introduced in commit 402b27f9, the only difference >> between blkif_request_segment_aligned and blkif_request_segment is >> that the former has a named padding, while both share the same >> memory layout. >> >> Also correct a few minor g

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] xen-blkif: drop struct blkif_request_segment_aligned

2014-02-04 Thread David Vrabel
On 04/02/14 10:26, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > This was wrongly introduced in commit 402b27f9, the only difference > between blkif_request_segment_aligned and blkif_request_segment is > that the former has a named padding, while both share the same > memory layout. > > Also correct a few minor glitch

[PATCH v2 4/4] xen-blkif: drop struct blkif_request_segment_aligned

2014-02-04 Thread Roger Pau Monne
This was wrongly introduced in commit 402b27f9, the only difference between blkif_request_segment_aligned and blkif_request_segment is that the former has a named padding, while both share the same memory layout. Also correct a few minor glitches in the description, including for it to no longer a