Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] linux/signal.h: Ignore SIGINFO by default in new tasks

2019-07-29 Thread Arseny Maslennikov
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > <...> > > (In particular it might be worth checking Linux ports of Oracle and > DB2.) A couple of weeks of asking around got me to have a look at a DB2 9.7 instance. sn1:~ # uname -a Linux sn1 2.6.16.60-0.54.5-ppc64 #1 SMP Fri Sep

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] linux/signal.h: Ignore SIGINFO by default in new tasks

2019-06-26 Thread Arseny Maslennikov
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 07:11:50PM +0300, Arseny Maslennikov wrote: > > This matches the behaviour of other Unix-like systems that have SIGINFO > > and causes less harm to processes that do not install handlers for this > > signal, ma

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] linux/signal.h: Ignore SIGINFO by default in new tasks

2019-06-25 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 07:11:50PM +0300, Arseny Maslennikov wrote: > This matches the behaviour of other Unix-like systems that have SIGINFO > and causes less harm to processes that do not install handlers for this > signal, making the keyboard status character non-fatal for them. > > This is imp

[PATCH v2 4/7] linux/signal.h: Ignore SIGINFO by default in new tasks

2019-06-25 Thread Arseny Maslennikov
This matches the behaviour of other Unix-like systems that have SIGINFO and causes less harm to processes that do not install handlers for this signal, making the keyboard status character non-fatal for them. This is implemented with the assumption that SIGINFO is defined to be equivalent to SIGPW