On 8/11/20 3:37 AM, Jason Xing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Could anyone take a look at this issue? I believe it is of high-importance.
> Though Eric gave the proper patch a few months ago, the stable branch
> still hasn't applied or merged this fix. It seems this patch was
> forgotten :(
Sure,
Hi everyone,
Could anyone take a look at this issue? I believe it is of high-importance.
Though Eric gave the proper patch a few months ago, the stable branch
still hasn't applied or merged this fix. It seems this patch was
forgotten :(
Thanks,
Jason
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:47 PM Jason Xing
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:10 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:01 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Jason Xing
> >
> > When using BBR mode, too many tcp socks cannot be released because of
> > duplicate use of the sock_hold() in the manner of tcp_internal_pacing()
> > when RTO happens.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:01 AM wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing
>
> When using BBR mode, too many tcp socks cannot be released because of
> duplicate use of the sock_hold() in the manner of tcp_internal_pacing()
> when RTO happens. Therefore, this situation maddly increases the slab
> memory and then
From: Jason Xing
When using BBR mode, too many tcp socks cannot be released because of
duplicate use of the sock_hold() in the manner of tcp_internal_pacing()
when RTO happens. Therefore, this situation maddly increases the slab
memory and then constantly triggers the OOM until crash.
Besides,
5 matches
Mail list logo
