On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit
wrote:
> Sorry for late reply. My concern is that removing the "quirk_amd_nb_node()"
> will affect the value of "numa_node" of the host bridge devices (i.e.
> X:00.[18|19|1a|1b|1c|1d|1e|1f].X). I am not sure if any code is using this
>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit
suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote:
Sorry for late reply. My concern is that removing the quirk_amd_nb_node()
will affect the value of numa_node of the host bridge devices (i.e.
X:00.[18|19|1a|1b|1c|1d|1e|1f].X). I am not sure if any
On 4/21/2014 11:53 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Hi Myron,
On 04/20/2014 09:44 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors
(11h, 12h,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
>> With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
>> 14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
>> removes it.
>>
>>
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
removes it.
On 4/21/2014 11:53 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Hi Myron,
On 04/20/2014 09:44 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD
Hi Myron,
On 04/20/2014 09:44 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to
Hi Myron,
On 04/20/2014 09:44 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h)
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
>> With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
>> 14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
>> removes it.
>>
>>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
> With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
> 14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
> removes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe
Good idea. Has this been tested,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
removes it.
Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe myron.st...@redhat.com
Good idea. Has this
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:53:46PM -0600, Myron Stowe wrote:
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
removes it.
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
removes it.
Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe
---
arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c | 58 --
1 files changed, 0
With the amd_bus.c updates to support additional AMD processors (11h, 12h,
14h 15h and 16h) 'quirk_amd_nb_node' seems to be redundant. This patch
removes it.
Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe myron.st...@redhat.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c | 58 --
1
14 matches
Mail list logo
