On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 04:04:40PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> OK, you're right. Peter, Boris, thanks for your information.
> I might need look at topology deeper. :-)
>
> So how about below update:
Please send a full patch, not those diffs ontop - I don't know about
Peter but I absolutely can't gr
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 05:59:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:10:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > + cpumask_clear(pmu->mask);
> > > > > + cpumask_clear(pmu->tmp_mask);
> > > > >
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < cores_per_cu; i++)
> > > > > +
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:10:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > + cpumask_clear(pmu->mask);
> > > > + cpumask_clear(pmu->tmp_mask);
> > > >
> > > > for (i = 0; i < cores_per_cu; i++)
> > > > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, pmu->mask);
> > > >
> > > > + cpuma
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:24:14PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:10:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:42:35PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > > > @@ -164,14 +171,14 @@ static int pmu_event_add(struct perf_event
> > > > > *event, int mode)
> > > >
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:10:40PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:42:35PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > > @@ -164,14 +171,14 @@ static int pmu_event_add(struct perf_event
> > > > *event, int mode)
> > > > struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > > > un
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:42:35PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > @@ -164,14 +171,14 @@ static int pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event,
> > > int mode)
> > > struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > > + raw_s
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:02:57AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:04:38PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > I just quickly looked at about the spinlock on -rt mode. Because
> > realtime linux kernel provides two kinds of spinlock, the original
> > spinlock_t will be replaced th
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:04:38PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> I just quickly looked at about the spinlock on -rt mode. Because
> realtime linux kernel provides two kinds of spinlock, the original
> spinlock_t will be replaced the one which is able to sleep, actually,
> like mutex. And another one (y
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:22:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:48:24PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Thanks so much to your comments.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:12:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:50:08AM +080
9 matches
Mail list logo