On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:14:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Looking into some cpuidle drivers for x86 I found at least one that
> doesn't respect this convention. Damn.
Which one? We should probably fix it :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> > The core idle loop now takes care of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre
> > Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 i
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> The core idle loop now takes care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/proces
The core idle loop now takes care of it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 3fb8d95ab8..4505e2a950 100644
--- a/ar
4 matches
Mail list logo