On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:04:31AM -0800, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:43 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > There is no need to wait for completion here.
> >
> > The host will process commands in submit order, so commands can
> > reference the new resource just fine even when q
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:43 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> There is no need to wait for completion here.
>
> The host will process commands in submit order, so commands can
> reference the new resource just fine even when queued up before
> completion.
Does virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl also wait for
Den 30.01.2019 10.43, skrev Gerd Hoffmann:
> There is no need to wait for completion here.
>
> The host will process commands in submit order, so commands can
> reference the new resource just fine even when queued up before
> completion.
>
> On the guest side there is no need to wait for comp
There is no need to wait for completion here.
The host will process commands in submit order, so commands can
reference the new resource just fine even when queued up before
completion.
On the guest side there is no need to wait for completion too. Which
btw is different from resource destroy, w
4 matches
Mail list logo