Hi Sergei,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 22:29:24, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >>> + rtc@44e3e000 {
>
> >> Address postfix in the node name without "reg" property?
>
> > As per [1], "The unit-address is included if the node describes
> > a device with an address".
>
>Which in this case
Hello.
On 07/25/2012 06:09 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>>> + rtc@44e3e000 {
>> Address postfix in the node name without "reg" property?
> As per [1], "The unit-address is included if the node describes
> a device with an address".
Which in this case it doesn't.
> Here even tho
Hi Sergei,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 16:50:56, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > + rtc@44e3e000 {
>
> Address postfix in the node name without "reg" property?
As per [1], "The unit-address is included if the node describes
a device with an address".
Here even though reg property is not pr
Hello.
On 25-07-2012 10:12, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
Add AM33xx rtc node.
Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed
---
v2:
Use compatible as ti,da830-rtc instead of ti,am1808-rtc
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/a
4 matches
Mail list logo
