On 31 May 2016 09:56:51 BST, Crestez Dan Leonard
wrote:
>On 05/31/2016 12:42 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 30 May 2016 14:44:41 BST, Crestez Dan Leonard
> wrote:
>>> On 05/29/2016 06:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 18/05/16 16:00, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> Right now it is poss
On 05/31/2016 12:42 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 30 May 2016 14:44:41 BST, Crestez Dan Leonard
> wrote:
>> On 05/29/2016 06:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 18/05/16 16:00, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
Right now it is possible to only enable some of the x/y/z channels,
>> for
exa
On 30 May 2016 14:44:41 BST, Crestez Dan Leonard
wrote:
>On 05/29/2016 06:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 18/05/16 16:00, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
>>> Right now it is possible to only enable some of the x/y/z channels,
>for
>>> example you can enable accel_z without x or y but if you act
On 05/29/2016 06:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 18/05/16 16:00, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
>> Right now it is possible to only enable some of the x/y/z channels, for
>> example you can enable accel_z without x or y but if you actually do
>> that what you get is actually only the x channel.
>>
On 18/05/16 16:00, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> Right now it is possible to only enable some of the x/y/z channels, for
> example you can enable accel_z without x or y but if you actually do
> that what you get is actually only the x channel.
>
> Fix this by reformatting the hardware sample to onl
Right now it is possible to only enable some of the x/y/z channels, for
example you can enable accel_z without x or y but if you actually do
that what you get is actually only the x channel.
Fix this by reformatting the hardware sample to only include the
requested channels.
Signed-off-by: Creste
6 matches
Mail list logo