On Thu, Mar 09 2017, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
>> data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync
>> since
>> another task could still have it open for
On Thu, Mar 09 2017, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
>> data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync
>> since
>> another task could still have it open for
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 13:38 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 18:01 +, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some
> > > inode
> > > data. Ensure that we communicate that
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 13:38 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 18:01 +, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some
> > > inode
> > > data. Ensure that we communicate that
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 18:01 +, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
> > data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync
> > since
> > another task could still
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 18:01 +, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
> > data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync
> > since
> > another task could still
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
> data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync
> since
> another task could still have it open for write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:29 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
> data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync
> since
> another task could still have it open for write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
> ---
>
If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync since
another task could still have it open for write.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
---
mm/truncate.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5
If launder_page fails, then we hit a problem writing back some inode
data. Ensure that we communicate that fact in a subsequent fsync since
another task could still have it open for write.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton
---
mm/truncate.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
10 matches
Mail list logo