On 01/02/2016 at 12:56:48 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote :
> > I'm fine with having parts per billion as the unit and I hope we won't
> > ever need anything more precise :)
> >
> It is orders of magnitude more than needed at present
Yeah, until we get an RTC with an offset precision that has 4 decim
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:41:15 +0100
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/01/2016 at 10:31:25 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote :
> > The file is called "offset", and may be set and read in decimal.
> > For rtcs that do not have read_offset or set_offset implemented,
> > read always returns zero and
Hi,
On 04/01/2016 at 10:31:25 -0800, Joshua Clayton wrote :
> The file is called "offset", and may be set and read in decimal.
> For rtcs that do not have read_offset or set_offset implemented,
> read always returns zero and write will return -EINVAL.
>
Can you expand rtc_attr_is_visible() instea
The file is called "offset", and may be set and read in decimal.
For rtcs that do not have read_offset or set_offset implemented,
read always returns zero and write will return -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Clayton
---
drivers/rtc/interface.c | 2 +-
drivers/rtc/rtc-sysfs.c | 29 ++
4 matches
Mail list logo