On 7/9/2019 2:09 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
On Jul 9, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
On 7/9/2019 1:09 PM, Russ Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it i
> On Jul 9, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/9/2019 1:09 PM, Russ Anderson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>
SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
On 7/9/2019 1:09 PM, Russ Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
it performs relatively to non-UV. Remove the code to simplify the code.
Y
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
> > SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
> > it performs relatively to non-UV. Remove the code to simplify the code.
>
> You should at least Cc the SGI/HP f
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
> SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
> it performs relatively to non-UV. Remove the code to simplify the code.
You should at least Cc the SGI/HP folks on that. They are still
around. Done so.
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra
> Cc: Da
SGI UV support is outdated and not maintained, and it is not clear how
it performs relatively to non-UV. Remove the code to simplify the code.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Dave Hansen
Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 25 -
1 fil
6 matches
Mail list logo
