send v3.
But to remind, this particular patch depends on Dave's fixes, so I will
send it later.
And I forgot to mention that I have another patch which removes the
trylock hack from __sb_start_write() as Dave suggested, it passed the
tests. But again, I'd really like to send it separately s
Jan, you seem to agree with these patches. How should we route
> this all?
Regarding the routing, ideally Al Viro should take these as a VFS
maintainer.
> -----------------------
> Subject: [PATCH v2 9/8] don't fool
ute
this all?
---
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/8] don't fool lockdep in freeze_super() and thaw_super()
paths
sb_wait_write()->percpu_rwsem_release() fools lockdep to avoid the
false-positives. Now that xfs was fixed by Dave we can remove it and
change freeze_super() and thaw
3 matches
Mail list logo