On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:02:56PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >>>@@ -453,7 +453,15 @@ int modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event
> >>>*bp, struct perf_event_attr *att
> >>> int old_type = bp->attr.bp_type;
> >>> int err = 0;
> >>>
> >>>-perf_event_disable(bp);
> >>>+/*
> >
On 07/19/2012 04:46 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
On 07/18/2012 05:27 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:00:46PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Please find v2 of the patch from Prasad, based on Peter Zijlstra's
feedback. This applies on top of v3.5-rc7. This has been tested and
f
On 07/18/2012 05:27 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:00:46PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Please find v2 of the patch from Prasad, based on Peter Zijlstra's
feedback. This applies on top of v3.5-rc7. This has been tested and
found to work fine by Edjunior.
Regards,
Navee
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 04:00:46PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Please find v2 of the patch from Prasad, based on Peter Zijlstra's
> feedback. This applies on top of v3.5-rc7. This has been tested and
> found to work fine by Edjunior.
>
> Regards,
> Naveen
> __
>
> From: K.Prasad
>
> While
Please find v2 of the patch from Prasad, based on Peter Zijlstra's
feedback. This applies on top of v3.5-rc7. This has been tested and
found to work fine by Edjunior.
Regards,
Naveen
__
From: K.Prasad
While debugging a warning message on PowerPC while using hardware
breakpoints, it was disc
5 matches
Mail list logo