On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:39:29AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 07:37:02PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> > Let me know when you have a set of patches you feel are good for testing
> > and I'll give them a go.
> This series of WIP is also good for testing.
well,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 07:37:02PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
Hi Alan,
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:08:25 +0530
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:20:26PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > > What does dd
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:08:25 +0530
Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:20:26PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > What does ddev stand for? Anyway, it's probably better to call it
> > > > bus_dev?
> > > ok.
> > > I t
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:04:54AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:20:26PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > What is the point of the check function really? The name isn't clear.
> > yes, i am a bit blunt in thinking of new names, i hope you have noticed
> > that in my n
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:20:26PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > What does ddev stand for? Anyway, it's probably better to call it
> > > bus_dev?
> > ok.
> > I think I will wait today for some comments from Greg and then send in
> >
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:20:26PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > What does ddev stand for? Anyway, it's probably better to call it
> > bus_dev?
> ok.
> I think I will wait today for some comments from Greg and then send in
> the v3 tomorrow.
Don't wait for me, it's going to be a week or so at
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:20:26PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > What is the point of the check function really? The name isn't clear.
> yes, i am a bit blunt in thinking of new names, i hope you have noticed
> that in my naming of the labels .. :)
>
> as the name was not sufficient i mention
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 06:18:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 07:22:34PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > .owner = NULL,
> > };
> >
> > +struct bus_type parport_bus_type = {
> > + .name = "parport",
> > +};
>
> Can you make this static? The
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 07:22:34PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> This is again another WIP for your review.
> almost all the points raised by Greg and Dan has been covered in this
> patch.
>
> apart from those points, I found another problem with my previous code,
> that whenever any driver is t
This is again another WIP for your review.
almost all the points raised by Greg and Dan has been covered in this
patch.
apart from those points, I found another problem with my previous code,
that whenever any driver is trying to register, it is getting bound to
all the available parallel ports. T
10 matches
Mail list logo
