On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 12:37:36AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2019 20:03:33 +0300
Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
Probably it's not good example for others how it should be used, not
a big problem to move it to separate pools.., even don't remember why
I decided to use shared p
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:08:03PM +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 20:03 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:25:24 +0300 Ivan Khoronzhuk <
> ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > On F
On Fri, 31 May 2019 20:03:33 +0300
Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> Probably it's not good example for others how it should be used, not
> a big problem to move it to separate pools.., even don't remember why
> I decided to use shared pool, there was some more reasons... need
> search in history.
Using
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 20:03 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:25:24 +0300 Ivan Khoronzhuk <
> > ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:25:24 +0300 Ivan Khoronzhuk
wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>From below code snippets, it looks like you only allocated 1 page_pool
>and sharing it
On Fri, 31 May 2019 19:25:24 +0300 Ivan Khoronzhuk
wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >
> >From below code snippets, it looks like you only allocated 1 page_pool
> >and sharing it with several RX-queues, as I don't have the full context
> >and do
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Hi Jesper,
Hi Ivan,
From below code snippets, it looks like you only allocated 1 page_pool
and sharing it with several RX-queues, as I don't have the full context
and don't know this driver, I might be wrong?
To be clear
Hi Ivan,
>From below code snippets, it looks like you only allocated 1 page_pool
and sharing it with several RX-queues, as I don't have the full context
and don't know this driver, I might be wrong?
To be clear, a page_pool object is needed per RX-queue, as it is
accessing a small RX page cache
Add XDP support based on rx page_pool allocator, one frame per page.
Page pool allocator is used with assumption that only one rx_handler
is running simultaneously. DMA map/unmap is reused from page pool
despite there is no need to map whole page.
Due to specific of cpsw, the same TX/RX handler ca
9 matches
Mail list logo
