On 04/16/2013 06:05 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:37:59PM +0100, Waiman Long wrote:
If it is confirmed that all the supported architectures can allow a
negative mutex count without incorrect behavior, we can then back
out the architecture specific change and allow the mutex c
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:37:59PM +0100, Waiman Long wrote:
> If it is confirmed that all the supported architectures can allow a
> negative mutex count without incorrect behavior, we can then back
> out the architecture specific change and allow the mutex count to
> go to any negative number. Tha
If it is confirmed that all the supported architectures can allow a
negative mutex count without incorrect behavior, we can then back
out the architecture specific change and allow the mutex count to
go to any negative number. That should further reduce contention for
non-x86 architecture.
If this
3 matches
Mail list logo