On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:54:08AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
[...]
> > Understood, the point I wanted to make is that adding a list of methods
> > in acpi_object_usage.txt ("Use as needed") is not necessarily additional
> > information, you can add a pointer at ACPI specs (for that specific
> >
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:54:08AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
[...]
> > Understood, the point I wanted to make is that adding a list of methods
> > in acpi_object_usage.txt ("Use as needed") is not necessarily additional
> > information, you can add a pointer at ACPI specs (for that specific
> >
On 3/28/16 5:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
For ACPI on arm64, tables also fall into the following categories:
- -- Required: DSDT, FADT, GTDT, MADT, MCFG, RSDP, SPCR, XSDT
+ -- Required: DSDT, FADT, GTDT, IORT, MADT, MCFG, RSDP, SPCR, XSDT
Nit: IORT will only be required on certain
On 3/28/16 5:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
For ACPI on arm64, tables also fall into the following categories:
- -- Required: DSDT, FADT, GTDT, MADT, MCFG, RSDP, SPCR, XSDT
+ -- Required: DSDT, FADT, GTDT, IORT, MADT, MCFG, RSDP, SPCR, XSDT
Nit: IORT will only be required on certain
On 04/15/2016 03:35 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:42 -0600
> Al Stone wrote:
>
>> This patch reflects going back through and examining the specs in detail
>> and updating content appropriately. Whilst there, a few odds and ends of
>> typos were
On 04/15/2016 03:35 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:42 -0600
> Al Stone wrote:
>
>> This patch reflects going back through and examining the specs in detail
>> and updating content appropriately. Whilst there, a few odds and ends of
>> typos were caught as well. This
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:42 -0600
Al Stone wrote:
> This patch reflects going back through and examining the specs in detail
> and updating content appropriately. Whilst there, a few odds and ends of
> typos were caught as well. This brings the documentation up to date
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:06:42 -0600
Al Stone wrote:
> This patch reflects going back through and examining the specs in detail
> and updating content appropriately. Whilst there, a few odds and ends of
> typos were caught as well. This brings the documentation up to date with
> ACPI 6.1 for
On 04/15/2016 11:47 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:41:02AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 04/15/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> Hi Al,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the
On 04/15/2016 11:47 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:41:02AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 04/15/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> Hi Al,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:41:02AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> >> 2016, but the arm64 kernel
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:41:02AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> >> 2016, but the arm64 kernel
On 04/15/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
>> for the 5.1 version of
On 04/15/2016 08:37 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
>> for the 5.1 version of
Hi Al,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec
Hi Al,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:06:42PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec
On 2016/3/29 8:06, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec that had not yet been mentioned
On 2016/3/29 8:06, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec that had not yet been mentioned
On 04/08/2016 07:12 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:50:55PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 03/28/2016 06:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
On 04/08/2016 07:12 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:50:55PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> On 03/28/2016 06:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
>>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:50:55PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 06:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:50:55PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 06:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> > The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> > 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> > for the 5.1 version of the spec. There
On 03/28/2016 06:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec that had not yet been
On 03/28/2016 06:06 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
> spec that had not yet been
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms
added to
The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms
added to
26 matches
Mail list logo