Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-30 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 29/10/2012 18:32, Borislav Petkov wrote: + Andreas. Dude, look at this boot log below: http://quora.org/2012/16-server-boot-2.txt That's 192 F10h's! We were booting 384 a while back, but I'll let you know when reach 4096! On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 04:54:59PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:

Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-29 Thread Borislav Petkov
+ Andreas. Dude, look at this boot log below: http://quora.org/2012/16-server-boot-2.txt That's 192 F10h's! On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 04:54:59PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > >A number of other callers lookup the PCI device based on index > >0..amd_nb_num(), but we can't easily allocate contig

Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 29/10/2012 14:17, Daniel J Blueman wrote: On 25/10/2012 19:03, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:32:52PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: The AMD Northbridge initialisation code and EDAC assume the Northbridge IDs are contiguous, which no longer holds on federated systems with

Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-28 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 25/10/2012 19:03, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:32:52PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: The AMD Northbridge initialisation code and EDAC assume the Northbridge IDs are contiguous, which no longer holds on federated systems with multiple HyperTransport fabrics and multiple P

Multiple patch authors (was: Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains)

2012-10-25 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:56:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > No, SOBs are to document patch forwarding. Co-authorship can be > expressed a number of ways, such as: > > Based-on-patch-from: Borislav Petkov > > and/or by adding you as a copyright holder to one of the files. Ok, let's hold this do

Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-25 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:32:52PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > > The AMD Northbridge initialisation code and EDAC assume the Northbridge IDs > > are contiguous, which no longer holds on federated systems with multiple > > HyperTransport fabrics and multiple PCI do

Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-25 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:32:52PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > The AMD Northbridge initialisation code and EDAC assume the Northbridge IDs > are contiguous, which no longer holds on federated systems with multiple > HyperTransport fabrics and multiple PCI domains, eg on Numascale's > Numaconne

[PATCH v3] Add support for AMD64 EDAC on multiple PCI domains

2012-10-25 Thread Daniel J Blueman
The AMD Northbridge initialisation code and EDAC assume the Northbridge IDs are contiguous, which no longer holds on federated systems with multiple HyperTransport fabrics and multiple PCI domains, eg on Numascale's Numaconnect systems with NumaChip. Address this assumption by searching the Northb