On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:20:12 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +again:
> spin_lock(_subdir_lock);
> for (p = >subdir; *p; p=&(*p)->next ) {
> if (!proc_match(len, fn, *p))
> continue;
> de = *p;
> +
> + /*
>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:20:12 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+again:
spin_lock(proc_subdir_lock);
for (p = parent-subdir; *p; p=(*p)-next ) {
if (!proc_match(len, fn, *p))
continue;
de = *p;
+
+ /*
+
Fed up with verifying various barrier-based schemes, this version uses
spinlock.
---
Current /proc creation interfaces suffer from at least two types of races:
1. Write
Fed up with verifying various barrier-based schemes, this version uses
spinlock.
---
Current /proc creation interfaces suffer from at least two types of races:
1. Write
4 matches
Mail list logo
