On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:24:47AM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
> After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
> with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
> built-in
Hi Thomas
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:24:47AM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
> After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
> with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:21:10AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 3/8/21 1:24 AM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
> > After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
> > with kernel_end") we started
On 3/8/21 1:24 AM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
> After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
> with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
> built-in FDT being corrupted.
>
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:24:47AM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
> After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
> with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
> built-in
BMIPS is one of the few platforms that do change the exception base.
After commit 2dcb39645441 ("memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations
with kernel_end") we started seeing BMIPS boards fail to boot with the
built-in FDT being corrupted.
Before the cited commit, early allocations would be in
6 matches
Mail list logo