On 10/20/2015 07:12 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 01:35 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> What tree did you use for this patch? It does not seem to apply to
>> mainline or Ralf's upstream-sfr.
>
> May I ask you to elaborate more and send me a concern details?
> I definitely rebased it to
On 10/20/2015 01:35 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
What tree did you use for this patch? It does not seem to apply to
mainline or Ralf's upstream-sfr.
May I ask you to elaborate more and send me a concern details?
I definitely rebased it to mips-for-linux-next of upstream-sfr from LMO.
- Leonid
I mailed it from LMO 'upstream-sfr'.
I pulled it last week.
I will check it again.
- Leonid.
On 10/19/2015 07:39 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> MIPS32 o32 ABI sigaction() processing on MIPS64 n64 kernel was incorrectly
> set to processing aka rt_sigaction() variant only.
>
> Fixed.
> --
> V3: Signature added.
> v2: Taken in account CONFIG vars interdependencies and conditional expression
>
MIPS32 o32 ABI sigaction() processing on MIPS64 n64 kernel was incorrectly
set to processing aka rt_sigaction() variant only.
Fixed.
--
V3: Signature added.
v2: Taken in account CONFIG vars interdependencies and conditional expression
simplified. As a result, the reverse problem fixed (introdu
5 matches
Mail list logo