On Wed 05-09-12 14:55:33, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 05-09-12 14:05:20, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 04-09-12 16:11:32, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > > >>1. Small files stored in the ICB (inode control block?): just return 0
> > > >>from the new udf_adinicb_direct_IO() handler to fall back to buffered
> > >
On Wed 05-09-12 14:05:20, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 04-09-12 16:11:32, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > >>1. Small files stored in the ICB (inode control block?): just return 0
> > >>from the new udf_adinicb_direct_IO() handler to fall back to buffered
> > >>I/O. For direct writes, there is a "gotcha" to
On Tue 04-09-12 16:11:32, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-09-04 15:39, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > first, you have my address wrong (you had suze instead of suse) which is
> >why I wasn't getting your email and not replying (missed the patch in LKML
> >traffic). Second, it's good to CC also
On 2012-09-04 16:11, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-09-04 15:39, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 04-09-12 10:49:39, Ian Abbott wrote:
Add support for the O_DIRECT flag. There are two cases to deal with:
Out of curiosity, do you have a use for this feature or is it mostly
academic interest?
I'm
On 2012-09-04 16:11, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-09-04 15:39, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 04-09-12 10:49:39, Ian Abbott wrote:
Add support for the O_DIRECT flag. There are two cases to deal with:
Out of curiosity, do you have a use for this feature or is it mostly
academic interest?
I'm
On Tue 04-09-12 16:11:32, Ian Abbott wrote:
On 2012-09-04 15:39, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
first, you have my address wrong (you had suze instead of suse) which is
why I wasn't getting your email and not replying (missed the patch in LKML
traffic). Second, it's good to CC also
On Wed 05-09-12 14:05:20, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 04-09-12 16:11:32, Ian Abbott wrote:
1. Small files stored in the ICB (inode control block?): just return 0
from the new udf_adinicb_direct_IO() handler to fall back to buffered
I/O. For direct writes, there is a gotcha to deal with when
On Wed 05-09-12 14:55:33, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 05-09-12 14:05:20, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 04-09-12 16:11:32, Ian Abbott wrote:
1. Small files stored in the ICB (inode control block?): just return 0
from the new udf_adinicb_direct_IO() handler to fall back to buffered
I/O. For direct
On 2012-09-04 15:39, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
first, you have my address wrong (you had suze instead of suse) which is
why I wasn't getting your email and not replying (missed the patch in LKML
traffic). Second, it's good to CC also linux-fsdevel for UDF related
matters (I tend to use that
Hello,
first, you have my address wrong (you had suze instead of suse) which is
why I wasn't getting your email and not replying (missed the patch in LKML
traffic). Second, it's good to CC also linux-fsdevel for UDF related
matters (I tend to use that for UDF announcements etc. so people
Add support for the O_DIRECT flag. There are two cases to deal with:
1. Small files stored in the ICB (inode control block?): just return 0
from the new udf_adinicb_direct_IO() handler to fall back to buffered
I/O. For direct writes, there is a "gotcha" to deal with when
Add support for the O_DIRECT flag. There are two cases to deal with:
1. Small files stored in the ICB (inode control block?): just return 0
from the new udf_adinicb_direct_IO() handler to fall back to buffered
I/O. For direct writes, there is a gotcha to deal with when
Hello,
first, you have my address wrong (you had suze instead of suse) which is
why I wasn't getting your email and not replying (missed the patch in LKML
traffic). Second, it's good to CC also linux-fsdevel for UDF related
matters (I tend to use that for UDF announcements etc. so people
On 2012-09-04 15:39, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
first, you have my address wrong (you had suze instead of suse) which is
why I wasn't getting your email and not replying (missed the patch in LKML
traffic). Second, it's good to CC also linux-fsdevel for UDF related
matters (I tend to use that
14 matches
Mail list logo
