On 09/08/14 15:38, Lars wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:05:28PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
On 09/07/14 11:58, Lars wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:41:18PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
From: "Palik, Imre"
If the drbd backing device is a new device mapper device (e.g., a
dm-linear mapping of an
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:05:28PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
> On 09/07/14 11:58, Lars wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:41:18PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
> >>From: "Palik, Imre"
> >>
> >>If the drbd backing device is a new device mapper device (e.g., a
> >>dm-linear mapping of an existing block
On 09/07/14 11:58, Lars wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:41:18PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
From: "Palik, Imre"
If the drbd backing device is a new device mapper device (e.g., a
dm-linear mapping of an existing block device that contains data), the
counters are initially 0 even though the devic
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:41:18PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
> From: "Palik, Imre"
>
> If the drbd backing device is a new device mapper device (e.g., a
> dm-linear mapping of an existing block device that contains data), the
> counters are initially 0 even though the device contains useful
> data
From: "Palik, Imre"
If the drbd backing device is a new device mapper device (e.g., a
dm-linear mapping of an existing block device that contains data), the
counters are initially 0 even though the device contains useful
data. This causes throttling until something accesses the drbd device
or the
5 matches
Mail list logo
