On 02/26/2016 08:11 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2016 10:54 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> -trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
>> +trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
>
> If !lock_functions(CAL
On 02/26/2016 10:54 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> - trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_parent_ip(CALLER_ADDR1));
> + trace_preempt_off(CALLER_ADDR0, get_lock_parent_ip());
If !lock_functions(CALLER_ADDR0), the start/stop_critical_timing() will
be called with par
The preempt_disable() invokes preempt_count_add() which saves the caller
in ->preempt_disable_ip. It uses CALLER_ADDR1 which does not look for
its caller but for the parent of the caller. Which means we get the correct
caller for something like spin_lock() unless the architectures inlines
those inv
3 matches
Mail list logo