> This patch conflicts significantly with Daniel's "slab: correct
> size_index table before replacing the bootstrap kmem_cache_node". I've
> reworked Daniel's patch as below. Please review?
Your revised version of my patch looks good to me. I've also re-tested LLVMLinux
with Gavin's and my (revi
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > + if (i == 2)
> > + i = (KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW - 1);
>
> Can we get rid of this by using something like
Nope index is a ilog2 value of the size. The table changes would not
preserve the mapping of the index to the power of t
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:26:00 +0800 Gavin Guo wrote:
> The slub_debug=PU,kmalloc-xx cannot work because in the
> create_kmalloc_caches() the s->name is created after the
> create_kmalloc_cache() is called. The name is NULL in the
> create_kmalloc_cache() so the kmem_cache_flags() would not set the
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:26:00 +0800 Gavin Guo wrote:
> The slub_debug=PU,kmalloc-xx cannot work because in the
> create_kmalloc_caches() the s->name is created after the
> create_kmalloc_cache() is called. The name is NULL in the
> create_kmalloc_cache() so the kmem_cache_flags() would not set the
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Gavin Guo wrote:
> - if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 64 && !kmalloc_caches[2] && i == 7)
> - kmalloc_caches[2] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 192,
> flags);
> + if (i == 2)
> + i = (KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW - 1);
> }
Ok th
The slub_debug=PU,kmalloc-xx cannot work because in the
create_kmalloc_caches() the s->name is created after the
create_kmalloc_cache() is called. The name is NULL in the
create_kmalloc_cache() so the kmem_cache_flags() would not set the
slub_debug flags to the s->flags. The fix here set up a kmall
6 matches
Mail list logo
