On 4/6/21 7:15 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 4/6/21 2:27 PM, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
>> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
>> one is PAGE_SIZE limitiation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
>> to "one value per file" rule.
>>
>> To overcome this issues,
On 4/6/21 2:27 PM, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
> one is PAGE_SIZE limitiation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
> to "one value per file" rule.
>
> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls implemeation
>
Hi Faiyaz,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v5.12-rc6]
[cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20210406]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
Hi Faiyaz,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v5.12-rc6]
[cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master next-20210406]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
one is PAGE_SIZE limitiation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
to "one value per file" rule.
To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls implemeation
to debugfs.
Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed
---
5 matches
Mail list logo
