Em Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 05:16:17AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> The hist__account_cycles is executed when the hist_iter__branch_callback
> is called. But it looks it's not necessary. In hist__account_cycles, it
> already walks on all branch entries.
>
> This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:35:17AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> Nobody like this patch? :)
>
> In my test, for a 72MB perf.data (with LBR data), the perf annotate
> processing speed:
>
> Before: 10.2s
> After: 2.2s
That's great!
-Andi
Nobody like this patch? :)
In my test, for a 72MB perf.data (with LBR data), the perf annotate
processing speed:
Before: 10.2s
After: 2.2s
Thanks
Jin Yao
On 3/16/2019 5:16 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
The hist__account_cycles is executed when the hist_iter__branch_callback
is called. But it looks it'
The hist__account_cycles is executed when the hist_iter__branch_callback
is called. But it looks it's not necessary. In hist__account_cycles, it
already walks on all branch entries.
This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.
Prev
4 matches
Mail list logo