Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:54:37PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On 8/19/2020 11:05 AM, Like Xu wrote:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> > On 2020/8/17 10:32, Jin, Yao wrote:
> > > Hi Arnaldo,
> > >
> > > On 8/14/2020 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:
Hi Arnaldo,
On 8/19/2020 11:05 AM, Like Xu wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On 2020/8/17 10:32, Jin, Yao wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On 8/14/2020 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:21:20AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.
Bu
Hi Arnaldo,
On 2020/8/17 10:32, Jin, Yao wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On 8/14/2020 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:21:20AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.
But it doesn't make sense in most cases that we reques
Hi Arnaldo,
On 8/14/2020 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:21:20AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.
But it doesn't make sense in most cases that we request for
user-space counting but we also get the gues
Em Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:21:20AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.
>
> But it doesn't make sense in most cases that we request for
> user-space counting but we also get the guest report.
>
> Of course, we also need to consider perf kvm us
Currently if we run 'perf record -e cycles:u', exclude_guest=0.
But it doesn't make sense in most cases that we request for
user-space counting but we also get the guest report.
Of course, we also need to consider perf kvm usage case that
authorized perf users on the host may only want to count g
6 matches
Mail list logo
