On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:37:02AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > Fixed by providing a dummy wath_queue_init() in !CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE
watch_queue_init(), that is
> > case and by having failures of wath_queue_init() handled the same way
On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 14:16 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 08:50:55AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > Calling pipe2() with O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE could results in memory leaks
> > in an error path or CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE=n. Plug them.
>
> [snip the copy of bug report]
>
> No objections on
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 08:50:55AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> Calling pipe2() with O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE could results in memory leaks
> in an error path or CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE=n. Plug them.
[snip the copy of bug report]
No objections on the patch itself, but commit message is just about
unreadable.
Calling pipe2() with O_NOTIFICATION_PIPE could results in memory leaks
in an error path or CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE=n. Plug them.
unreferenced object 0xc0141114a0d8 (size 992):
comm "trinity-c61", pid 1353192, jiffies 4296255779 (age 25989.560s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
80 11 00 00 e8 03
4 matches
Mail list logo