Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-08 0:31 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > 2017-12-07 3:14 GMT+09:00 Paolo Pisati : >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada >> wrote: >>> Just one question to Paolo: >>> >>> If some change

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-08 0:31 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > 2017-12-07 3:14 GMT+09:00 Paolo Pisati : >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada >> wrote: >>> Just one question to Paolo: >>> >>> If some change like firmware removal happens in the future, >>> patching for snapcraft is necessary? >>>

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-07 3:14 GMT+09:00 Paolo Pisati : > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> Just one question to Paolo: >> >> If some change like firmware removal happens in the future, >> patching for snapcraft is

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-07 3:14 GMT+09:00 Paolo Pisati : > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> Just one question to Paolo: >> >> If some change like firmware removal happens in the future, >> patching for snapcraft is necessary? >> (i.e. users are required to upgrade snapcraft

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Just one question to Paolo: > > If some change like firmware removal happens in the future, > patching for snapcraft is necessary? > (i.e. users are required to upgrade snapcraft from --edge ?) > > I

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Just one question to Paolo: > > If some change like firmware removal happens in the future, > patching for snapcraft is necessary? > (i.e. users are required to upgrade snapcraft from --edge ?) > > I guess the answer is yes,

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-06 6:23 GMT+09:00 Jim Davis : > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Paolo Pisati > wrote: > >>> I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option >>> the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-12-06 6:23 GMT+09:00 Jim Davis : > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Paolo Pisati > wrote: > >>> I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option >>> the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to >>> have finished successfully. Should the

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: >> I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option >> the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to >> have finished successfully. Should the snap-pkg target stop after

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: >> I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option >> the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to >> have finished successfully. Should the snap-pkg target stop after a >> tar failure? > > That

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Jim Davis wrote: > > If I run /snap/bin/snapcraft --version now on that Ubuntu 16.04 VM I > am getting 2.36+git2.ae61453. Yep, the edge channel follows the bleeding edge: $ snap info snapcraft ... channels: stable:2.35

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Jim Davis wrote: > > If I run /snap/bin/snapcraft --version now on that Ubuntu 16.04 VM I > am getting 2.36+git2.ae61453. Yep, the edge channel follows the bleeding edge: $ snap info snapcraft ... channels: stable:2.35(794) 53MB classic

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Since you are already patching snapcraft for this, why not embed the > whole support in snapcraft? Eg something like snapcraft --kernel > /path/to/kernel > > The key advantage you'll get is being able to support old

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Since you are already patching snapcraft for this, why not embed the > whole support in snapcraft? Eg something like snapcraft --kernel > /path/to/kernel > > The key advantage you'll get is being able to support old kernel versions too.

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On 29 November 2017 at 19:05, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> >> Worked for me too, >> after updating snapcraft. >> >> >> Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? >> What

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On 29 November 2017 at 19:05, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> >> Worked for me too, >> after updating snapcraft. >> >> >> Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? >> What is the minimum version? 2.35 ? > > The minimum version is

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> >> Worked for me too, >> after updating snapcraft. >> >> >> Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? >>

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> >> Worked for me too, >> after updating snapcraft. >> >> >> Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? >> What is the minimum version? 2.35 ? > > The minimum

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Worked for me too, > after updating snapcraft. > > > Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? > What is the minimum version? 2.35 ? The minimum version is 2.35+ - what is about to become

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Worked for me too, > after updating snapcraft. > > > Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? > What is the minimum version? 2.35 ? The minimum version is 2.35+ - what is about to become 2.36 anytime soon now. -- bye,

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

Weird, are you sure you are checking the snap version? $ /snap/bin/snapcraft --version snapcraft, version 2.35+git26.0474d85 $ snap info snapcraft name: snapcraft summary: easily create snaps publisher: canonical contact: snappy-canonical-storeacco...@canonical.com description: |

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

Weird, are you sure you are checking the snap version? $ /snap/bin/snapcraft --version snapcraft, version 2.35+git26.0474d85 $ snap info snapcraft name: snapcraft summary: easily create snaps publisher: canonical contact: snappy-canonical-storeacco...@canonical.com description: |

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-11-29 4:35 GMT+09:00 Jim Davis : > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Paolo Pisati > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >>> >>> With this patch applied to the 4.14 kernel source, and running make

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

2017-11-29 4:35 GMT+09:00 Jim Davis : > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Paolo Pisati > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >>> >>> With this patch applied to the 4.14 kernel source, and running make >>> snap-pkg on a Ubuntu 16.04 VM with the latest 16.04 kernel config

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >> >> With this patch applied to the 4.14 kernel source, and running make >> snap-pkg on a Ubuntu 16.04 VM with the latest 16.04 kernel

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >> >> With this patch applied to the 4.14 kernel source, and running make >> snap-pkg on a Ubuntu 16.04 VM with the latest 16.04 kernel config >> file, I ran into >> >> Traceback (most

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jim Davis wrote: > > With this patch applied to the 4.14 kernel source, and running make > snap-pkg on a Ubuntu 16.04 VM with the latest 16.04 kernel config > file, I ran into > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jim Davis wrote: > > With this patch applied to the 4.14 kernel source, and running make > snap-pkg on a Ubuntu 16.04 VM with the latest 16.04 kernel config > file, I ran into > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3.5/shutil.py", line

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > Following in footsteps of other targets like 'deb-pkg, 'rpm-pkg' and > 'tar-pkg', > this patch adds a 'snap-pkg' target for the creation of a Linux kernel snap > package using the kbuild infrastructure. With this

Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > Following in footsteps of other targets like 'deb-pkg, 'rpm-pkg' and > 'tar-pkg', > this patch adds a 'snap-pkg' target for the creation of a Linux kernel snap > package using the kbuild infrastructure. With this patch applied to the 4.14

[PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

Following in footsteps of other targets like 'deb-pkg, 'rpm-pkg' and 'tar-pkg', this patch adds a 'snap-pkg' target for the creation of a Linux kernel snap package using the kbuild infrastructure. A snap, in its general form, is a self contained, sandboxed, universal package and it is intended to

[PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

Following in footsteps of other targets like 'deb-pkg, 'rpm-pkg' and 'tar-pkg', this patch adds a 'snap-pkg' target for the creation of a Linux kernel snap package using the kbuild infrastructure. A snap, in its general form, is a self contained, sandboxed, universal package and it is intended to